New Woodstock


Published in The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1509-1558, ed. S.T. Bindoff, 1982
Available from Boydell and Brewer



Main Article

New Woodstock was incorporated in 1453, when it was granted similar liberties to those of New Windsor but was expressly exempted from the obligation ‘to choose any burgesses from the borough to come to the King’s Parliaments’, although it had done so at least twice in the early 14th century: according to a local historian the charter, with the same concession, was confirmed in 1552. A mayor and a serjeant-at-mace were the only officials mentioned in 1453 but by 1519 there were also four aldermen and 13 councilmen. In 1552 the houses which had grown up around the royal manor can have formed little more than a village, since only six inhabitants were assessed for subsidy.2

At first sight the revival of Woodstock’s parliamentary representation presents no problem. The first known Members sat in the Parliament of October 1553 and it is natural to conclude that the borough was re-enfranchised for that Parliament. Such a departure would also accord well with the circumstances prevailing at the time, with Sir Leonard Chamberlain as the key figure. As sheriff of Oxfordshire and Berkshire it lay with Chamberlain to conduct the elections in both shires, and as steward or lieutenant of the manor of Woodstock he could persuade the corporation to forgo its century-old exemption. For so ardent a supporter of the new Queen it would have been an opportunity not to be missed and an initiative which could count on official support.

This straightforward explanation may not, however, be the right one. Even granted that Chamberlain was the prime mover, it does not necessarily follow that his opportunity only came with the accession of Mary. He had been sheriff since the previous November, and the confidence in him which his choice for that office implied is borne out by the commission given him in 1552 to form a new bodyguard for Edward VI. He might thus have solicited the re-enfranchisement of Woodstock for the Parliament of March 1553, and the fact that no Members’ names have survived would not be unusual at an election for which many other names a