Appleby

Borough

Published in The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1715-1754, ed. R. Sedgwick, 1970
Available from Boydell and Brewer

Background Information

Right of Election:

in burgage holders

Number of voters:

184 in 17231

Elections

DateCandidateVotes
3 Feb. 1715SIR RICHARD SANDFORD 
 THOMAS LUTWYCHE 
26 Mar. 1722SACKVILLE TUFTON 
 SIR RICHARD SANDFORD 
2 May 1723JAMES LOWTHER vice Sandford, deceased99
 Trevor Hill, Visct. Hillsborough85
8 Sept. 1727SACKVILLE TUFTON 
 JOHN RAMSDEN 
24 Jan. 1730WALTER PLUMER vice Tufton, called to the Upper House 
7 May 1734JOHN RAMSDEN 
 WALTER PLUMER 
11 May 1741SIR JOHN RAMSDEN 
 GEORGE BUBB DODINGTON 
1 Jan. 1742SIR CHARLES WYNDHAM vice Dodington, chose to sit for Bridgwater 
6 July 1747SIR JOHN RAMSDEN 
 RANDLE WILBRAHAM 

Main Article

At George I’s accession the chief interests at Appleby were those of the Tory earls of Thanet, who owned Appleby castle, and of two Whig Westmorland families, the Lowthers, Viscounts Lonsdale, and the Sandfords of Howgill castle. On 9 Oct. 1714 the bishop of Carlisle wrote to James Lowther:

Brigadier Stanwix has been happily instrumental in carrying one great point for Sir Richard Sandford at Appleby. His brother[-in-law] Nevinson seemed resolved to accept of the mayoralty, notwithstanding the due election (according to charter) of Mr. John Baynes. But the late mayor was at last persuaded to consider the hazard which he would be in by countenancing such illegal pretensions and therefore resigned his staff to Baynes.2

Sandford was returned unopposed with Thomas Lutwyche, a Tufton candidate, with whom he had sat for the borough since 1713. Re-elected unopposed in 1722 with Sackville Tufton, from 1729 7th Earl of Thanet, he died in 1723, when an attempt by the Tuftons to gain control of both seats was defeated by James Lowther. In 1725 Henry Lowther, 3rd Viscount Lonsdale, and Sackville Tufton, ‘in order to prevent further animosities and disputes, and to keep up and preserve a good understanding between them’, made an agreement providing that each was to recommend one Member; that they were to take turns in nominating the mayor, aldermen and councilmen; and that neither was to buy burgages without notice to the other. The agreement was observed by both parties, each returning one Member without opposition. It was renewed on Lonsdale’s death in 1751, but on Thanet’s in 1753 it was allowed to lapse.3

Author: Romney R. Sedgwick

Notes

  • 1. State of the borough of Appleby, Newcastle (Clumber) mss.
  • 2. HMC 13th Rep. VII, 248.
  • 3. B. Bonsall, Sir Jas. Lowther and Cumb. and Westmld. Elections, 17-18.