Derby

Borough

Published in The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1790-1820, ed. R. Thorne, 1986
Available from Boydell and Brewer

Background Information

Right of Election:

in the freemen

Number of voters:

about 650

Population:

(1801): 10,832

Elections

DateCandidateVotes
19 June 1790LORD GEORGE AUGUSTUS HENRY CAVENDISH 
 EDWARD COKE 
25 May 1796LORD GEORGE AUGUSTUS HENRY CAVENDISH239
 EDWARD COKE238
 Peter Crompton6
2 Jan. 1797 HON. GEORGE WALPOLE vice Cavendish, vacated his seat 
5 July 1802HON. GEORGE WALPOLE 
 EDWARD COKE 
1 Nov. 1806WILLIAM CAVENDISH 
 EDWARD COKE 
26 Feb. 1807 THOMAS WILLIAM COKE I vice Coke, vacated his seat 
5 May 1807WILLIAM CAVENDISH 
 EDWARD COKE 
8 Feb. 1812 HENRY FREDERICK COMPTON CAVENDISH vice Cavendish, deceased 
6 Oct. 1812HENRY FREDERICK COMPTON CAVENDISH 
 EDWARD COKE 
17 June 1818HENRY FREDERICK COMPTON CAVENDISH 
 THOMAS WILLIAM COKE II 

Main Article

Since 1780 the corporation nominee, Edward Coke of Longford, had joined interests with the 5th Duke of Devonshire, whose nomination to one seat at least was long established and who returned his brother. Both Members were Foxite Whigs, but neither voted for parliamentary reform in 1793, despite a petition from Derby in its favour (6 May). At the election of 1796 a local physician of means, Peter Crompton, standing as a reformer, made no impact against them, though he was said to have great influence on the corporation.1 Coke substituted his brother for himself for part of the Parliament of 1806 when the latter was unseated for Norfolk, and his son in 1818. The 5th and 6th Dukes of Devonshire continued until 1820 to return members of their family. It was not until then that opposition was again contemplated: James Abercromby* informed the 6th Duke, ‘the True Blue Club is preparing to oppose you and the corporation’.2

Author: R. G. Thorne

Notes

  • 1. Jnl. of William Bagshaw Stevens, 61, 108.
  • 2. Chatsworth mss, Abercromby to Devonshire [2 Mar. 1820].